|
Articles for Spring
2004
The
Forgotten Chapters of The Lord of the Rings: Tolkien's Challenge
to the Conventional Quest
By Thomas Bowler
Dante's
Love: Earthly or Extraordinary?
By David Brensinger
Snapshots
From the Ether: E-mail Narratives in Contemporary Literature
By Jeremy Cooke
Food
as a Marker of Cultural Duality in Jhumpa Lahiri's Interpreter of Maladies
By Elizabeth Jin
Dealing
With A S-T-A-U-N-C-H Character: Locating Edie Beale's Cultural Significance
By Christina Jordan
"Otherness"
in Charlotte Mew's Poetry
By Natalie Kressen
Constructed
Love: Mis-fulfilled Expectations in Troilus and Criseyde
By Michael Opest
"There
are More Things in Heaven and Earth": Magic, Nature, and Art in the
Short Stories of Mary Butts
By Michael Ritchey
Saving Privatization:
Speilberg and the Neoliberal War Film
By Josh Smicker
|
Snapshots From the Ether: E-mail Narratives
in Contemporary Literature
By Jeremy Cooke
[ Contents
| Abstract
| Intro | I
| II | III
| IV | V
| VI ]
[ Notes
| Works Cited
| Appendix
]
Chat Connect
Crash
Nan McCarthy's trilogy Chat Connect Crash
represents one of the earliest examples of fiction written in e-mail form
to reach a broad audience beyond the web. The story that the "cyberseries"
tells is best treated as one arc of narrative, even though the three installments
were written over a period of years while the author kept her day job in
the computer industry. The first thin volume appeared in 1995; the second
arrived the next year; and third came out in 1998. In discussing e-mail
narratives that appeared later, at least two book reviewers—Helen
Rumbelow of The Times of London and Vasili Stavropoulos in the Sydney
Morning Herald—cite McCarthy's work as an early venture into this
particular mode of narration. The reviewers acknowledge that the trilogy
is by no means the definitive tale told through e-mail messages, but at
least affirm that it was one of the first, if not the first.
How the books came to be and how they found an audience corresponds with
the passage of "e-pistolary" novels, as Rumbelow dubs them, from
the insular world of the early internet to the broader realm of mainstream
publishing. McCarthy also conceived the books under didactic considerations
similar to those of Richardson two centuries earlier. In an interview with
the Chicago Sun-Times—published itself as a series of e-mail
exchanges—McCarthy explains how the idea came about:
[In 1995] one of my friends
had just gotten onto America Online, and he was real excited about
how he was meeting people. [. . .] By that point I was kind of blasé
about the whole thing—I'd been online for 8 years and at that
point I sort of saw the Internet through his eyes—through new
eyes—of all the exciting social possibilities. So [. . .] we
started fantasizing about wouldn't it be neat to write a novel told
entirely through e-mail messages. And the idea just kind of took hold
of me. (Weathersbee)
In the same way that Richardson wrote Pamela partially with the goal
of instructing people in the art of letter-writing, McCarthy typed out a
series of fake e-mail messages with the aim of showing new internet users
how they could "connect" with others using the new medium. Upon
writing her first installment, Chat, McCarthy initially circumvented
the traditional publishing world by printing the book herself and hawking
it online via her personal website. Later, an old-fashioned letter exchange
with syndicated newspaper humor columnist Dave Barry gave her a leg up,
when her notes were posted on internet bulletin boards (Strassel). Orders
for the book increased steadily. By 1998, with all three volumes written,
Pocket Books, a division of Simon & Schuster, agreed to publish them
as trade paperbacks in October of that year, thereby introducing Chat
Connect Crash to a readership with perhaps less internet savvy.
In terms of plot, the story of Chat Connect Crash is not groundbreaking.
It follows the rise and fall of an adulterous relationship. It begins innocently
enough, but grows more intense when Max and Bev, the male and female correspondents,
have an anonymous tryst at a computer show, and consider dropping everything
to be with each other once they realize their physical partnership matched
their digital and emotional one. It ends with the death of Max in a plane
crash on his way to live with Bev, noted on the final page with a sterile
internet news report. McCarthy depicts her characters with a few broad strokes:
Max, a copywriter and online newbie, enjoys watching hockey and drinking
martinis when he's not online; Bev, a book editor who studies typography
for fun, seems more married to her computer than to her off-screen and off-stage
husband. Based on the interview with McCarthy noted earlier, one can imagine
Bev as a stand-in for the author herself and Max as McCarthy's real-life
friend who had just joined AOL.
John Naughton in The Times of London calls the story "slight—a
kind of Bridges of Madison County in cyberspace." Also, in a
broader column about technology and communication, Susan Schwartz of The
Gazette of Montreal tersely pans McCarthy's first installment: "[The]
romance develops entirely through electronic messages—cheap, glib
ones." Many of the early reviewers observe that Chat amounts
to little more than a romance novel with a technological twist in presentation.
Whether or not McCarthy was aware of it in her writing, Chat Connect
Crash presents shades of the same underlying moral that comes out of
the more transparent early seduction novels written in epistolary form:
An illicit relationship—in this case, a married woman and an unmarried
man—conducted clandestinely via written correspondence ultimately
leads to destruction and thus should be avoided. However, while Richardson
filled his novels with supporting characters ready to admonish young, impressionable
heroines about the dangers of seduction, McCarthy largely circumvents the
moral sanctions found in earlier novels. Besides sheer geographical distance,
the greatest obstacle preventing Bev and Max from being together is Bev's
own guilt for betraying her husband, Gary. In the forebodingly titled third
volume, Crash—a computer failure as well as a plane failure—Bev
finally avows her love for Max, but he questions her hesitation. She writes
back with her reasoning:
Because I felt guilty, Max.
I've known for a long time that I love you, and it became even more
clear to me during the weekend we spent together. But I still feel
terrible about what I was doing to Gary by being with you there, and
I guess I felt that if I actually said the words out loud to you it
would be the final insult to Gary. (Crash 64)
When readers reach the last page and discover Max's fate—"Plane
Crashes Near Lake Michigan"—they can come away with the same
moral of the fatal dangers of seduction, but the justice meted out to him
is almost exclusively of a cosmic nature, without any building reproach
from members within Bev's or Max's families or communities, as we would
have seen in the works of Richardson and his ilk. We cannot ignore that
Bev is married as well as older than most epistolary-novel heroines of that
time; this status diminishes the transgression, when compared with any virginal
victims. Bev also falls in love and lusts after Max within a society that
has lost some of its safeguards against seduction and infidelity. Their
romance goes on more deeply below the social radar. In terms of novelistic
forerunners, the ending also harkens back to the matter-of-fact description
of Werther's death in Goethe submitted by the "editor" as a frame
for that narrative. The final "News Flash" on page 117 of Crash
proves that even—and perhaps especially—the "e-pistolary"
form needs a frame from time to time to flesh out the story. These comparisons
to the past are noteworthy for showing how the contemporary work reflects
great works within the canon, but the author's decision—and the decisions
by the other three authors examined later— reveals an intention to
engage the trends of e-mail use at the moment they were writing.
Chat Connect Crash is, at heart, an at-work romance. The two correspondents
frequently talk about work. They are both in the "words" industry—Bev
in publishing and Max in advertising. Because of the way their messages
connect them, they might as well be sitting in different cubicles, even
though they are separated by several states. This work context also allows
Bev to be able to maintain an online relationship with Max without her husband
worrying as much.
E-mail was primarily a business tool for the generations who were first
exposed to it within their job environments, and this narrative represents
Max's introduction to the medium as a means of social interaction, and ultimately,
pleasure. It captures feelings and decisions from a period in the history
of computers that is gradually passing away, as more and more children from
middle- and upper-class families log on from an early age and exist in a
world where the internet is pervasive.
From the first page of Chat, where the main characters' "member
profiles" [6]
are listed, their occupations and companies shape who they are in our eyes
and in theirs (Chat 1). Their fictional e-mail addresses—BevJ@frederic_gerard.com
and Maximilian@miller&morris.com—include their employers' names.
These companies are repeated in the heading of each message throughout the
novel, and constantly remind us that this whole relationship was conducted
on company time or otherwise using company-granted e-mail addresses. The
characters meet in a public internet chat room called the "Writer's
Forum," and Max decides to strike up a correspondence after he sees
Bev there (Chat 3). What goes on in each user's workplace is one
of the three main topics of discussion for the online pair, besides computers
and love relationships.
Bev perceives correctly that Max is a newcomer to online interaction, and
he quickly admits that he "got online a few weeks ago" (Chat
10). It remains unclear whether this statement means he was granted his
work-based e-mail address only a short while ago or he just never strayed
beyond the realm of work-based messaging until now. Bev takes it upon herself
to teach him about online conversational acronyms and emoticons as well
as general etiquette. McCarthy includes a glossary of acronyms, abbreviations,
emoticons, and other symbols in the back of each installment, but Bev also
explains their use to Max:
p.s. You must be new online
- "BTW" stands for "by the way." People use all
sorts of acronyms like that to make typing online faster and easier.
The asterisks are used for emphasis, because you can't type in italics
online. Some people use underscores at the beginning and end of a
word or phrase (_like this_) to mean the same thing. (Chat
7)
Also known as smiley faces, or smileys, emoticons are combinations of characters
that were invented to help express emotion in a sometimes sterile environment.
One of the most basic emoticons is a smiling face with eyes, a nose, and
a mouth, which looks like what is contained inside the following brackets:
[ :-) ]. The persistence of smiley use from the early days of the internet
until now may reveal an underlying concern about the adequacy of typed language.
Visually minded letter writers have long embellished their missives with
illustrations, but e-mail writers exhibit a particular anxiety that the
emotional messages they are trying to convey may not get through, without
the aid of such representative collections of printed characters. While
the emoticon seems to have remained popular since its first appearance,
other affectations of e-mail correspondence have morphed with time.
In the glossaries, the author chooses to print many more instances of computer
shorthand than Bev and Max ultimately use in their e-mail messages to one
another. Here lies the potential for such wired talk to become quickly dated.
The practice of abbreviation in computer-based communication continues apace—and
would probably be worthy of its own linguistic study—but a quick perusal
of the abbreviations McCarthy and her alter-ego Bev so readily preach about
reveals that some of these acronyms and neo-words have a short shelf life.
Because the creation and development of these shortcuts are so decentralized,
it remains quite a challenge to judge how long they will last and how pervasive
they may be. The time Bev spends explaining things to Max may seem elementary
to many adult readers, even a mere five years after publication of the last
volume. Among the acronyms listed in the back of Chat, this avid
reader and internet user, for example, has never encountered: FWIW ("for
what it's worth"); G,D&R ("grinning, ducking & running");
GMTA ("great minds think alike"); IMA ("I might add");
OTOH ("on the other hand"); PMFJI ("pardon me for jumping
in"); or TPTB ("the powers that be"). Already, these terms
seem arcane, even to one who has been online since 1992. In addition, the
use of asterisks or underscores to emphasize words has started to become
obsolete as e-mail and instant-messaging programs have expanded their features
to include bold face and italics among other more advanced text-formatting
options. Such minor details of e-mail along the trajectory of its development
change swiftly. We might ascertain two related motives from the use of these
glossaries—one somewhat self-congratulatory and the other more visionary.
McCarthy may have chosen to include the abbreviations guide as an attempt
to propagate some of her favorites via her imagined readership. Perhaps
she hoped that the popularity of her books would encourage people to start
communicating with these slices of shorthand. On the other hand, she could
have been farsighted in her inclusion of them, seeing herself more as a
chronicler than as one who hopes to shape language use on the internet.
Perhaps the abbreviations accompanying Chat Connect Crash were truly
in vogue at the time of McCarthy's writing, and the glossaries instead offer
us a snapshot from that period of e-mail exchange and live chat messaging.
Another internet practice Bev highlights in her early asides to Max is the
practice of adding a disclaimer after a "flame." She writes: "Just
so you know—a 'flame' is a message from someone who's pissed off and
venting a lot of steam; my message is pretty mild compared to some of the
flames you see online" (Chat 9). While people have continued
to flame—and flame one another—in e-mail since then, it has
become rarer to see any such disclaimer afterward. This is one of the potential
downfalls of electronic mail that the Rand authors cited in their 1985 report,
but most users today have either learned to guard against "flaming"
more attentively, avoid it altogether, or not even include a disclaimer.
It feels rather unnatural for Bev to insert such an explanation after she
has let her emotions spill onto the keyboard. In practice, people are more
likely to send highly charged messages without pausing midway and affixing
a "flame alert" somewhere in the body of the text.
Despite the questionable shelf-life of Bev's shorthand lessons for Max,
he takes these tips as gospel and starts using the shortcuts himself throughout
the balance of their correspondence. This behavior further reflects the
transition Max and a host of other Max-type computer users encountered during
the 1990s as they began to see e-mail as more than just a modern memo service
for the office. In the novel, Bev was born in 1959 and Max in 1963; thus,
they did not come of age during a time when they were likely to have been
exposed to personal computers. The use of e-mail was a skill that they had
to acquire, presumably through the business world, unlike the generations
that followed them, which see such skills as more natural and intrinsic
parts of their communication.
In late October of the novel—after Max and Bev have unknowingly engaged
in an anonymous one-night stand with each other—Max writes to Bev:
"I just want to know what you get from being online. I've been thinking
about it myself lately, and I'm curious as to what other people gain from
this whole online thing" (Chat 100-1). If we were to replace
"online" with "on the telephone," and asked the same
question of someone today, they would probably think us very strange. But
at this time in the development of the internet, among people of this age
group in particular, such a query does not seem out of place. Bev writes
that she got online because she "had to": "Several years
ago I had a boss who was really into CompuServe, so we all got accounts
and had to learn our way around" (Chat 101). Then she says she
got hooked on the practice and mentions two common reasons for the internet's
popularity: talking to people from all over the world and reading about
what they are doing. She calls herself a "communications junkie,"
and says that the internet is the latest means for her to get that fix (Chat
102). [7]
Max says he wanted to keep up with his guy friends, who began talking more
about "modem speeds, RAM, and hard drives" (Chat 102).
For both characters, the choice to start using e-mail for work and play
at the time was a conscious one. They adopted a technology that was becoming
more prevalent each day, and started discovering a place for it in their
lives. Chat Connect Crash is a period piece from a time when espousal
of electronic communication was not a given. This scenario contrasts with
the next novel, in which the younger narrator enters the online scene at
a different place.
[ Next
>> ]
[ Contents
| Abstract
| Intro | I
| II | III
| IV | V
| VI ]
[ Notes
| Works Cited
| Appendix
]
|
Deluge Links
Home
Contents
Submit to
us
E-mail
Last Year's
Issue
English
Department
Penn State
|